A number of constructions within the metal and engineering industries complicate hopes that the Metal and Engineering Industries Federation of Southern Africa’s wage proposal will lengthen all through the sector.
- The Metal and Engineering Industries Federation of Southern Africa introduced a three-year proposal for a 4.4% enhance throughout the board within the first yr.
- The Nationwide Union of Metalworkers of SA needs a one-year cope with 15% throughout the board.
- Solidarity says it’s going to canvas membership however expects problems within the SEIFSA deal for non-SEIFSA employers.
Whereas the metal and engineering sector has offered a revised wage provide to workers, unions are usually not optimistic that it will likely be a simple promote to members.
They are saying there’s nonetheless a big hole between the provide and their calls for. Negotiations are usually not easy, both, with a number of constructions concerned – in addition to 1 223 corporations with some 167 000 workers.
On Tuesday, the Metal and Engineering Industries Federation of Southern Africa (SEIFSA) introduced a revised wage provide within the sector in a bid to strike a cope with 5 unions on the Metals and Engineering Industries Federation of Southern Africa.
The provide is a 4.4% CPI enhance throughout the board for one yr, 0.5% plus CPI within the second and 1% plus CPI within the third yr.
The unions negotiating are Solidarity, Uasa, the Nationwide Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa), the Metallic and Electrical Staff of SA and the SA Fairness Staff’ Affiliation.
Complicated course of
Numsa and Solidarity informed Fin24 that there have been a number of constructions negotiating wages within the sector, together with the Nationwide Employers’ Affiliation of South Africa (NEASA) and the Metallic and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council (MEIBC).
Unions say the presence of a number of constructions within the sector – all with their very own negotiation processes – may complicate plans to increase SEIFSA’s provide as a deal all through the sector.
Numsa spokesperson Phakamile Hlubi-Majola informed Fin24 that the union had a bunch of calls for for employers, together with a 15% across-the-board enhance in a one-year settlement.
It additionally needs all excellent points to be concluded inside six months, according to managing committee (manco) agreements.
“We demand that the principle settlement should be prioritised, and as quickly as we now have finalised the settlement, a particular manco assembly should be held instantly thereafter to make sure all events vote to gazette the settlement,” mentioned Hlubi-Majola.
Hlubi-Majola mentioned all will increase should be primarily based on the precise charges of pay as the present dispensation pushes unions to agree with the “down-varying” of the essential circumstances of employment, which she says is completed to accommodate employers.
“Our members complain about the truth that there’s already no uniformity within the utility of the minimal fee and this has resulted in a system the place some staff are paid the speed in full, whereas others are exploited and paid far lower than they’re entitled to,” Hlubi-Majola mentioned.
Hlubi-Majola mentioned Numsa needed to proceed with discussions to seek out widespread floor and resolve the present spherical of wage talks.
Numsa is consulting members on the best way ahead and has arrange one other assembly on 26 and 27 July for an additional spherical of talks.
Solidarity basic secretary Willie Venter mentioned whereas SEIFSA is proposing 4.4%, the proposal is predicated on a number of pay grades, so will increase is not going to apply the identical approach throughout the board.
He was additionally circumspect concerning the standing of the provide as employers haven’t all weighed in but.
“We name it a proposed enhance on [the] minimal pay grade or wage grade. Salaries of various grades additionally differ. Expert, semi-skilled and unskilled workers are in numerous grades and there will probably be a differentiation on enhance percentages,” mentioned Venter.
Venter mentioned he was conscious that SEIFSA needed to increase its settlement to the entire business and make it one for all employers to abide by. Nevertheless, he mentioned, they wanted the unions to purchase in and for SEIFSA to get extra employers within the settlement and on board.
“We is not going to lengthen an settlement to employers that aren’t half and parcel to those negotiations and if it’s not legally prolonged. It appears like a closing provide, roughly. [But] it’s not [confirmed] as they are saying they do not have a mandate from employers to desk the provide. We are going to entertain it in the identical approach,” Venter mentioned.
Venter mentioned whereas Solidarity will probably be returning to its membership to hunt a mandate, members are usually not prone to perceive the necessity on SEIFSA’s half to get employers – who don’t negotiate at SEIFSA to start with – on board with their settlement.
“Wage negotiations are usually not the identical as a decade in the past the place one group dominated and it was simpler to increase an settlement.
“It has drastically modified to 2 employer blocs with parallel wage negotiations. SIEFSA and breakaway teams like SEIFA [and] NEASA have their very own negotiations. This makes extending agreements much more sophisticated,” he mentioned.